From stevep@pcsec.demon.co.uk  Thu May 23 03:26:58 1996
Received: from relay-4.mail.demon.net (relay-4.mail.demon.net [158.152.1.108]) by suburbia.net (8.7.4/Proff-950810) with SMTP id DAA31535 for <best-of-security@suburbia.net>; Thu, 23 May 1996 03:24:40 +1000
Received: from post.demon.co.uk ([158.152.1.72]) by relay-4.mail.demon.net
          id bw06490; 22 May 96 16:55 GMT
Received: from pcsec.demon.co.uk ([158.152.126.225]) by relay-3.mail.demon.net
          id aa13929; 22 May 96 17:05 +0100
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 16:50:37 GMT
From: Steve Phillippo <stevep@pcsec.demon.co.uk>
Reply-To: stevep@pcsec.demon.co.uk
Message-Id: <788@pcsec.demon.co.uk>
To: best-of-security@suburbia.net
Subject: Windows 95 Security
X-Mailer: FIMail V0.9d
X-User: PC Security Ltd
X-User: WEB Site http://www.usa.net/pcsl/
X-User: Tel. +44 1628 890390
Lines: 157

In your message dated Tuesday 16, April 1996 you wrote :
> Does anyone know of a checklist for Windows 95 security vulnerabilities?  If 
so,
> where might I find it?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Todd A. Hudspeth


Todd, I have a PowerPoint presentation on Win95 weaknesses.  I think it will 
loose alot by putting it here without the graphics.  I will fax you a full copy 
if you like.


Windows 95 Security Features

by Steve Phillippo

Framework for Security Product Analysis

Identification and Authentication
Access Controls
Auditing
Integrity
Security Management Tools
Assurance Level

Security Feature in Windows 3.1

Screen Blanker
No Logon
Screen Blanker did not function in full screen DOS sessions
Reboot to gain access to the PC!

Security Features in WFWG

Logon Screen for Networking and Password Cache
FAX Security using RSA if compatible FAX machine used.
Password Caching i.e. SSO to Microsoft Applications
Users can share resources via a share password

New Security Features in Win95

Single Point of Authentication?
Single Point of Password Change?
PassThru Security.  Users can share resources via Netware or NT group membership
Personal User Desktops
Require Validation by Network Option
Restrict a PC to only run authorised applications.

Looks good?
Lets take a more detailed look

Single Point of Authentication?

Logon Screen now supports non-MS Networks
Support for Novell (Bindery and NDS?)
Support for other major networks
You can access the system without a password, or add yourself as a user to the 
PC

Single Point of Password Change?
Lets try and change our Netware password!

Users can share resources via Netware or NT group membership

No administration, USERs decide what to share.
Full access is gained if you logon at the PC, access only restricted 
Peer-to-Peer
Access control mechanism not robust

Personal User Desktops

More of a usability feature than a security feature, as users CAN access 
programs not on their desktop.
Basic controls exist to try and stop users running applications not on the 
desktop.

Require Validation by Network Option

This feature forces a network logon prior to allowing access to Windows.  
However you can get round this just by removing the network cable, or the usual 
boot from floppy!

Restrict a PC to only run authorised applications

An un-manageable feature, which protects programs not data.
If allow access to DOS prompt, all DOS programs run.
Can rename programs to bypass protection using the standard desktop.

Windows 95

Identification and Authentication   Weak
Access Controls                     Remote Only
Auditing                            None
Integrity                           Poor
Security Management Tools           Poor - DIY
Assurance Level                     None

Leading Brand X

Identification and Authentication   Medium/Strong
Access Controls                     Good
Auditing                            Yes
Integrity                           Good
Security Management Tools           SCenSOS & FM
Assurance Level                     ITSEC E3

What's Missing from Win95

No Robust User Authentication
Can cancel out of logon, or add yourself
What's Missing from Win95
No Robust User Authentication
No support for tokens etc.
No Workstation Controls
No Boot Protection
Can access all data by booting from floppy
No File Encryption
No Auditing.

Connectivity Features of Win95 Increase Risk

The Microsoft Network
Direct Cable Connection
Internet
Dial Up Networking
If Resources are Shared in Win95 they could be Shared to the Whole World!

How Can I Plug The Security Holes?
Using a specialist PC Security product such as Stoplock V
CAUTION: Old DOS/Windows security products will require updating for Windows 
95!!

Information at Your Fingertips  It Certainly is in Windows 95!
Where do you want to go Today?  Go where you like, as Windows 95 is unlikely 
to stop you.

Inside Windows 95 Quote - MS-Press
The design of the FAT filesystem alone means that a Windows 95 machine is 
probably insecure--at least not up to the level of security required by the 
stringent government specifications that Windows NT complies with. Infact 
presentations of the Windows 95 network security feature usually include some 
form of this statement: 

if you want something thats small, fast and easy to use, we have it; if you 
want something thats bulletproof, use Windows NT.

But I would say that was debateable too!

-- 
Steve Phillippo
PC Security Ltd
Tel: +44 1628 890390
US WEB Site: http://www.usa.net/pcsl/

